<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/mmm2008-07-24_12.50/rsspretty.aspx?rssquery=en-US;http%3a%2f%2fravisankar.spaces.live.com%2fcategory%2fSecurity%2ffeed.rss' version='1.0'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:msn="http://schemas.microsoft.com/msn/spaces/2005/rss" xmlns:live="http://schemas.microsoft.com/live/spaces/2006/rss" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:cf="http://www.microsoft.com/schemas/rss/core/2005" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Ravi Sankar: Security</title><description /><link>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/?_c11_BlogPart_BlogPart=blogview&amp;_c=BlogPart&amp;partqs=catSecurity</link><language>en-US</language><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:59:30 GMT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:59:30 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>Microsoft Spaces v1.1</generator><docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs><ttl>60</ttl><cf:parentRSS>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/blog/feed.rss</cf:parentRSS><live:type>blogcategory</live:type><live:identity><live:id>-4068663427360258391</live:id><live:alias>ravisankar</live:alias></live:identity><cf:listinfo><cf:group ns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/live/spaces/2006/rss" element="typelabel" label="Type" /><cf:group ns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/live/spaces/2006/rss" element="tag" label="Tag" /><cf:group element="category" label="Category" /><cf:sort element="pubDate" label="Date" data-type="date" default="true" /><cf:sort element="title" label="Title" data-type="string" /><cf:sort ns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" element="comments" label="Comments" data-type="number" /></cf:listinfo><item><title>How to block USB based storage devices in Windows XP</title><link>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!326.entry</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I keep getting this question from many people on how to block USB storage devices in Windows XP. Here is the &lt;a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/823732" target="_blank"&gt;solution&lt;/a&gt;, may be not as smart as the group policy based solution in Vista. &lt;div style="padding-right:0px;display:inline;padding-left:0px;padding-bottom:0px;margin:0px;padding-top:0px"&gt;Technorati Tags: &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Disable USB" rel=tag&gt;Disable USB&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://c.services.spaces.live.com/CollectionWebService/c.gif?cid=-4068663427360258391&amp;page=RSS%3a+How+to+block+USB+based+storage+devices+in+Windows+XP&amp;referrer=" width="1px" height="1px" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;img style="position:absolute" alt="" width="0px" height="0px" src="http://c.live.com/c.gif?NC=31263&amp;amp;NA=1149&amp;amp;PI=73329&amp;amp;RF=&amp;amp;DI=3919&amp;amp;PS=85545&amp;amp;TP=ravisankar.spaces.live.com&amp;amp;GT1=ravisankar"&gt;</description><comments>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!326.entry#comment</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!326.entry</guid><pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:16:20 GMT</pubDate><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><msn:type>blogentry</msn:type><live:type>blogentry</live:type><live:typelabel>Blog entry</live:typelabel><wfw:commentRss>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!326/comments/feed.rss</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!326.entry#comment</wfw:comment><dcterms:modified>2007-12-16T19:16:20Z</dcterms:modified></item><item><title>8 Ways to Stop Ninjas</title><link>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!270.entry</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very funny! Watch this site &lt;a href="http://www.easyeasier.com"&gt;www.easyeasier.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;div style="padding-right:0px;display:inline;padding-left:0px;padding-bottom:0px;margin:0px;padding-top:0px"&gt;Technorati Tags: &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Security" rel=tag&gt;Security&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://c.services.spaces.live.com/CollectionWebService/c.gif?cid=-4068663427360258391&amp;page=RSS%3a+8+Ways+to+Stop+Ninjas&amp;referrer=" width="1px" height="1px" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;img style="position:absolute" alt="" width="0px" height="0px" src="http://c.live.com/c.gif?NC=31263&amp;amp;NA=1149&amp;amp;PI=73329&amp;amp;RF=&amp;amp;DI=3919&amp;amp;PS=85545&amp;amp;TP=ravisankar.spaces.live.com&amp;amp;GT1=ravisankar"&gt;</description><comments>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!270.entry#comment</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!270.entry</guid><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 04:06:15 GMT</pubDate><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><msn:type>blogentry</msn:type><live:type>blogentry</live:type><live:typelabel>Blog entry</live:typelabel><wfw:commentRss>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!270/comments/feed.rss</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!270.entry#comment</wfw:comment><dcterms:modified>2007-07-28T04:06:15Z</dcterms:modified></item><item><title>Windows is the most secure operating system - Symantec</title><link>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!186.entry</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Windows was considered to be a less secure than other operating systems by many people in the IT industry. But this perception is changing. Microsoft has done a tremendous job in increasing the security of its products in the recent past. A recent report by Symantec (no friend of Microsoft) says that Windows has fewer vulnerabilities than its other counterparts. To read more &lt;a href="http://www.internetnews.com/security/article.php/3667201" target="_blank"&gt;click here&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;p&gt;  &lt;div style="padding-right:0px;display:inline;padding-left:0px;float:none;padding-bottom:0px;margin:0px;padding-top:0px"&gt;Technorati Tags: &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Microsoft" rel=tag&gt;Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Windows" rel=tag&gt;Windows&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Security" rel=tag&gt;Security&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/OS" rel=tag&gt;OS&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Opearating System" rel=tag&gt;Opearating System&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://c.services.spaces.live.com/CollectionWebService/c.gif?cid=-4068663427360258391&amp;page=RSS%3a+Windows+is+the+most+secure+operating+system+-+Symantec&amp;referrer=" width="1px" height="1px" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;img style="position:absolute" alt="" width="0px" height="0px" src="http://c.live.com/c.gif?NC=31263&amp;amp;NA=1149&amp;amp;PI=73329&amp;amp;RF=&amp;amp;DI=3919&amp;amp;PS=85545&amp;amp;TP=ravisankar.spaces.live.com&amp;amp;GT1=ravisankar"&gt;</description><comments>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!186.entry#comment</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!186.entry</guid><pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 05:33:50 GMT</pubDate><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><msn:type>blogentry</msn:type><live:type>blogentry</live:type><live:typelabel>Blog entry</live:typelabel><wfw:commentRss>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!186/comments/feed.rss</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!186.entry#comment</wfw:comment><dcterms:modified>2007-07-01T05:36:00Z</dcterms:modified></item><item><title>Browsing from multiple subnets through ISA Server</title><link>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!185.entry</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The other day I was configuring ISA server 2006 to enable internet browsing. I created a new array level policy to enable DNS, HTTP and HTTPS traffic. Users were able to access the internet from the same subnet as ISA server. But users connecting from other subnets were not able to access the internet. So I checked the connectivity from the client to ISA server's network and VLAN settings. Everything was fine. Finally I checked the event log in ISA server and found that the ISA server is dropping the packets due to a suspected spoof attack. Why should requests coming from a different subnet be considered as spoof? This is because ISA server believes that requests coming from any network which does not have a direct route mentioned in its routing table are spoof. So what is the solution? Simple! Add a static route using the &lt;em&gt;route add &lt;/em&gt;command.  &lt;div style="padding-right:0px;display:inline;padding-left:0px;float:none;padding-bottom:0px;margin:0px;padding-top:0px"&gt;Technorati Tags: &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/ISA Server" rel=tag&gt;ISA Server&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/browsing" rel=tag&gt;browsing&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/different subnet" rel=tag&gt;different subnet&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/event ID 15108" rel=tag&gt;event ID 15108&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://technorati.com/tags/spoof" rel=tag&gt;spoof&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://c.services.spaces.live.com/CollectionWebService/c.gif?cid=-4068663427360258391&amp;page=RSS%3a+Browsing+from+multiple+subnets+through+ISA+Server&amp;referrer=" width="1px" height="1px" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;img style="position:absolute" alt="" width="0px" height="0px" src="http://c.live.com/c.gif?NC=31263&amp;amp;NA=1149&amp;amp;PI=73329&amp;amp;RF=&amp;amp;DI=3919&amp;amp;PS=85545&amp;amp;TP=ravisankar.spaces.live.com&amp;amp;GT1=ravisankar"&gt;</description><comments>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!185.entry#comment</comments><guid isPermaLink="true">http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!185.entry</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:33:17 GMT</pubDate><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><msn:type>blogentry</msn:type><live:type>blogentry</live:type><live:typelabel>Blog entry</live:typelabel><wfw:commentRss>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!185/comments/feed.rss</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment>http://ravisankar.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!C789342B659186A9!185.entry#comment</wfw:comment><dcterms:modified>2007-07-01T05:34:40Z</dcterms:modified></item></channel></rss>